Q has warned us of this at least 30 times over the past few years. I truly believed this but now I realize I understood it backwards or wrongly.
I always considered it to be an unanswered question in our Constitution that would have to be answered by the Supreme Court that apparently the founders or the writers of the Constitution didn't quite go clear enough in detail on. But now I see my serious mistake. I thought it would be the original Republic that we had the problem with.
Today I'm beginning to understand that it's the De Facto Corporation that's going to have the constitutional question because what I see being set up is that Trump is going to refuse to be inaugurated. This begs the question of the Constitution of how do they fill that spurned seat and if at the time they are exposed as being bankrupt, De Facto and illegal. All of this means a lot of congressmen will be vacating their seats at this time as well.
So the constitutional question by the De Facto is how it is like a balloon, that's in the process of popping, piece itself back together when its corporate Constitution doesn't specify how to do something like this, all while he De Facto tries to hold the public's support while they watch the De Facto's actions?
Sports fans this weekend is going to be a fun one. Stay tuned.